<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Hi,<br>
<br>
In order not to ask for every other sign I try to write :) I first
check if there is one similar in ASL and then look for the video
here[1] to be certain. It's great for learning, although sometimes
I get even more confused (as with "fumble"), usually it helps.<br>
<br>
In this case I didn't know whether to use strike # or touch * for
this [2] sign in my language, or whether I need an arrow, maybe the
strike/touch is enough? I would write it like this:<br>
<br>
<img src="cid:part1.04020606.02030507@gmail.com" alt="">or <img
src="cid:part2.08030509.03020805@gmail.com" alt="">, or <img
src="cid:part3.09030206.02080304@gmail.com" alt="">. Are there
some rules of style I can read about? Something that would help
decide which writing is better? I assume that the ASL signs have
been reviewed by more people and take them as the example to follow,
but that might not always be the case.<br>
<br>
Looking for something similar in ASL I ended up in "make", but there
are two versions, one with * and one with #. They do not use arrows
though, so I guess I can also do without.<br>
<br>
<img src="cid:part4.05010400.01040204@gmail.com" alt=""><br>
<br>
<img src="cid:part5.05040909.08030107@gmail.com" alt=""><br>
<br>
But I wonder, are those two texts meant to represent the same sign
in ASL? They're different alright, but I haven't found alternatives
for "make" in the online dictionaries.<br>
<br>
Eduardo.<br>
<br>
[1] <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.signingsavvy.com/">http://www.signingsavvy.com/</a><br>
[2] <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVxz_CUViYg#t=2m12s">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVxz_CUViYg#t=2m12s</a><br>
</body>
</html>