<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/15/12 8:43 AM, Charles Butler
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1347716617.92836.YahooMailNeo@web163401.mail.gq1.yahoo.com"
type="cite">
<div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:arial,
helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12pt">
<div><span>If one downloads from the SignPuddle without naming
the sign, the word "glyph" is used for the whole sign
representation. <br>
</span></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
That is incorrect. SignPuddle uses the term glyph only for
individual symbols of the ISWA. <br>
<br>
In SignPuddle, if you save a sign that doesn't have a name
associated with it, it will use the term glyphogram: a writing of
glyphs handled as a single unit.<br>
<br>
I use the term glyph and glyphogram as the name of 2 different
scripts in the SignWriting Image Server. The glyph script produces
symbol images. The glyphogram script produces sign, column, or row
images.<br>
<br>
The basic writing mark of SignWriting is a symbol that is associated
with a phoneme. The basic writing mark of a logographic script is
the word which represents a morpheme. SignWriting is not
logographic. <br>
<br>
-Steve<br>
</body>
</html>