MAGARS, MAGYARS, MUGARS & MOGHULS
Allen W Thrasher
athr at LOC.GOV
Fri Apr 22 00:45:44 UTC 2005
VYAKARAN: South Asian Languages and Linguistics Net
Editors: Tej K. Bhatia, Syracuse University, New York
John Peterson, University of Osnabrueck, Germany
Details: Send email to listserv at listserv.syr.edu and say: INFO VYAKARAN
Subscribe:Send email to listserv at listserv.syr.edu and say:
SUBSCRIBE VYAKARAN FIRST_NAME LAST_NAME
(Substitute your real name for first_name last_name)
Dear Mr. Rana,
I used the Harvard-Kyoto system for transliterating Sanskrit and related language in Email, which you can find at <http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/Help/sanskrit.html>, to represent La[with macron]n[with dot above]gha[macron]li[macron], or in simple English without diacritics, Langhali, just as you say. Dr. van Diem doesn't deny that (Central) Magar and Kham Magar are different; he just says they form a group.
I was merely passing on something, not trying to express an opinion on the matter. But van Diem does clearly say that Buda Magar and F. A. Uxbond (which I discover my Library in cataloging the book mentioned has decided is a pseudonym for Wilhelm von Hevesy) assert a relation between Magyars and Magars. Neith van Diem nor I asserted the same.
Please be so good as to contact me off the Vyakaran list if your Langhali Association starts publishing books, pamphlets, or even a newsletter, because we would want such materials for the Library of Congress's collections.
Allen W. Thrasher, Ph.D.
Senior Reference Librarian
Southern Asia Section
Library of Congress
Jefferson Building 150
101 Independence Ave., S.E.
Washington, DC 20540-4810
athr at loc.gov
The opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the Library of Congress.
More information about the Vyakaran