Ms. /Gay - NYTIMES
A. Vine
avine at ENG.SUN.COM
Mon May 24 17:49:22 UTC 1999
Kathleen Miller wrote:
>
>
> And this is from the editors on August 5, 1984 in response to a Safire (ON
> LANGUAGE; GOODBYE SEX, HELLO GENDER )column,
>
> "From the Editors,
>
> Some days the Title Question appears to claim more time - and ignite more
> passion - than the East-West arms race.
>
> We accept anyone's choice - in this case, Geraldine Ferraro's choice - of a
> professional name. But a titleis not part of the name. Publications vary in
> tone, and the titles they affix to names will differ accordingly.
> The Times clings to traditional ones ( Mrs., Miss and Dr., for example). As
> for Ms. - that useful
> business-letter coinage - we reconsider it from time to time; to our ear,
> it still sounds too contrived for news writing.
>
> Among traditional titles, why not heed the bearer's choice, assuming it
> isn't deceitful? Representative
> Ferraro's Mrs. seems no more a matter of ''right'' or ''wrong'' than the
> preferences of Beverly Greenough (Miss Sills), Joan Dunne (Miss Didion),
> Diana Silberstein (Miss Ross), Meryl Gummer (Miss Streep) or Dr. Henry A.
> Kissinger (who favors Mr. ).
>
> As Mr. Safire might put it, they're all entitled."
Back in the days when I took the Sunday Times and read Mr. Safire's column, I
remember the Geraldine Ferraro reference (I suspect it was the same column
quoted above). As I recall, Mr. Safire objected to "Mrs. Ferraro", saying that
was wrong somehow. He said it should be either "Ms. Ferraro" or "Mrs.
Zaccaro". I remember wondering what the last name had to do with the title.
She is a married woman, hence the "Mrs.". What name is after the "Mrs." seemed
as irrelevant to me as what the name is after the "Ms.". I think Mr. Safire's
prescriptivism was really starting to get to me at that point.
Andrea
--
Andrea Vine
Sun Internet Mail Server i18n architect
avine at eng.sun.com
Romanes eunt domus.
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list