proof of age - I know its off topic but...
Donald M. Lance
LanceDM at MISSOURI.EDU
Sat Feb 5 06:25:30 UTC 2000
Still off topic. The summer before JFK was shot, I was reading the Dallas Morning News,
to which the people for whom I was house-sitting (in Austin) subscribed. I could barely
stand to look at the front page because they ALWAYS twisted some story to turn it into
Kennedy-bashing. That fall, during 4th period, my accelerated senior English students
interrupted and asked, "Is that true what they're saying out there?" DML: "What are they
saying?" "That President Kennedy was shot." DML: "Where is he today?" "In Dallas.' DML:
"Could be." Words CAN kill.
And NO, I don't for a split second believe that LBJ had anything to do with it. The
Dallas papers were as anti-LBJ as they were anti-JFK. School children in Dallas cheered,
but not my students in Corpus Christi. The Corpus papers (Hart-Hanks chain, for those who
know of this 1950s-60s group) were supportive of JFK and LBJ.
"Peter A. McGraw" wrote:
> Still off-topic, and still with apologies, but while JFK's assination was
> indeed "a segment of the population recalling a shared sense of grief," it
> was much more. It was the shattering of a world we had all inhabited until
> then, and would now never be able to return to. Assassinations had been
> something that we read about in history books, not something that could
> ACTUALLY HAPPEN in our own experience. Suddenly it was real, and an alien
> concept, vulnerability, was staring us in right the face.
> I don't claim I analyzed all this clearly in my mind when I heard the news,
> but I think it was all mixed in with the emotions and was what drove the
> sense of disbelief. Even though the emotions were different, for me the
> JFK assassination was much more akin to the fall of the Berlin Wall than to
> the Challenger disaster in its world-changing dimension.
More information about the Ads-l