Aaron E. Drews
aaron at LING.ED.AC.UK
Fri Feb 11 11:05:19 UTC 2000
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Anne Lambert wrote:
}Speaking of hw-w distinguishers, I have been told that this is a
}generational difference. I always thought that it was a regional
}difference; most people I know from the Northeast don't use it, but I,
}from Chicago, do. I think maybe this is a feature that started in the
}Northeast and may have migrated west over the generations. Any comments?
Isn't a lot (most?) language change generational? Herold (1990) (as cited
in Labov 1994: 323) shows how the caught-cot merger differs between a
father and son, so that distinction is generational, although it started
off as regional. Fifty years from now, it might be like hw-w, in that it's
generational, and only in a defined region.
Aaron E. Drews The University of Edinburgh
aaron at ling.ed.ac.uk Departments of English Language and
http://www.ling.ed.ac.uk/~aaron Theoretical & Applied Linguistics
"MERE ACCUMULATION OF OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE IS NOT PROOF"
More information about the Ads-l