The benefits of illegal proposals

[Dennis R. Preston]

Bob,

Read the while story. I made no claim about any teacher's being qualified
or unqualified to teach "comparative religion" (certainly not any subject).
I reponded to the previous message's claim that they were unqualified. My
point was that even if they were, that would be a strage reason not to
teach a subject. I think I'm on board.

dInIs (whose feet are on the deck)

>"Dennis R. Preston" wrote:
>
>> Hmmmm. This is a very interesting reponse. Since teachers in US public
>> schools aren't qualified to teach a subject, let's not do it.
>
>Dennis, I think you've gone overboard a bit on this. Do you mean "some"
>teachers
>or all teachers? And "any" subject?
>
>Bob


Dennis R. Preston
Department of Linguistics and Languages
Michigan State University
East Lansing MI 48824-1027 USA
preston at pilot.msu.edu
Office: (517)353-0740
Fax: (517)432-2736