'Critical' Age

[Bob Haas]

I'm sorry.  I'll think of you while I drink my coffee and read the paper.
BTW, Scott's goggles were fun.  I thought later, though, that we should've
taken them down to the park.  That would've been a good place for a try-out.

> From: Bob Fitzke <fitzke at VOYAGER.NET>
> Reply-To: American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 09:22:21 -0500
> To: ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
> Subject: Re: 'Critical' Age
>
> Thanks for the site.
>
> Bob
>
> "Aaron E. Drews" wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, Bob Fitzke wrote:
>>
>> }Reading thus stimulated a question, "Has anyone ever analyzed the evolution
>> of
>> }language from the perspective of evolutionary theory?"
>>
>> I'm not sure about the Lg&Evol group here.  Check out their website from
>> http://www.ling.ed.ac.uk  (no, this isn't a plug).   I know there's a lot
>> of computational stuff, but I'm sure *someone* has alluded to Darwin.
>>
>> --Aaron
>>
>> ________________________________________________________________________
>> Aaron E. Drews                               The University of Edinburgh
>> aaron at ling.ed.ac.uk                  Departments of English Language and
>> http://www.ling.ed.ac.uk/~aaron       Theoretical & Applied  Linguistics
>>
>> "MERE ACCUMULATION OF OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE IS NOT PROOF"
>> --Death