Past-Subjunctive WAS in counter-to-fact IF clauses

Arnold Zwicky zwicky at CSLI.STANFORD.EDU
Thu Nov 30 00:03:07 UTC 2000


james e. clapp:
 >Fowler's 1926 entry on "Subjunctives" is not easy reading, so I
 >could be missing something--in which case I hope you will point out
 >and explicate the relevant passage--but I just don't see anything in
 >there about the appropriate verb form for referring to hypothetical
 >circumstances contrary to fact in the past.

i see that i read fowler too hastily (it does takes some considerable
care to understand the passage in question).  disregard my previous
comment on this topic.

arnold (zwicky at csli.stanford.edu)



More information about the Ads-l mailing list