Fwd: Re: Samuel, Samantha
gcohen at UMR.EDU
Sat Apr 20 23:40:56 UTC 2002
>X-Authentication-Warning: shell01.TheWorld.com: mam owned process doing -bs
>Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 18:52:02 -0400
>Reply-To: American Name Society <ANS-L at LISTSERV.BINGHAMTON.EDU>
>Sender: American Name Society <ANS-L at LISTSERV.BINGHAMTON.EDU>
>From: Mark A Mandel <mam at THEWORLD.COM>
>Subject: Re: Samuel, Samantha
>To: ANS-L at LISTSERV.BINGHAMTON.EDU
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Apr 2002 23:26:16.0987 (UTC)
>On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Edwin D. Lawson wrote:
>#Dunkling goes on to explain that Samantha is a feminine form of Samuel and
>#goes back to the 17th century. Dunkling has a fairly long interesting
>#discussion of the use of the name in literature and films.
>Well, whaddya know! I'm surprised, and I'm pleased to learn such an odd
>onomastic fact. I had always supposed, without data, that "Samantha" was
>an unrelated name, associated with "Samuel" only by the "Sam-".
>I'd like to see Dunkling's discussion. Where can I find the Facts on
>File dictionary of first names? Is it available on-line?
>-- Mark A. Mandel
> Linguist at Large
More information about the Ads-l