Hamantash vs. Latkes (was Dreidle & Latkes (1916))
Jesse Sheidlower
jester at PANIX.COM
Wed Aug 7 02:26:00 UTC 2002
On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 10:24:22PM -0400, Laurence Horn wrote:
> Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
> >On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 09:00:07PM -0400, Mark A Mandel wrote:
> >> On Tue, 6 Aug 2002, Laurence Horn wrote:
> >>
> >> #>Each year at U of C there are the hamantaschen/latke debates.
> >>
> >> Is that C for California or Chicago? The late, much-missed Jim McCawley
> >> ran something of the sort in Chicago, and wrote a hilarious paper on
> >> them.
> >
> >Chicago! We're trying to ignore our theoretical training and take
> >over the lexicographical world.
> >
> >Chicago is always called "U of C". Isn't Cal called "Cal" or
> >"Berkeley" or "UCLA" or something?
> >
> Um...well... UC Berkeley is also called UC. I don't think it's ever
> U of C, but I could be wrong.
Ah, but that's just it--the University of Chicago is always "U of
C" but never "UC". So there's no conflict with Berkeley unless the
latter is ever called "U of C".
Jesse Sheidlower
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list