the long and the short of it
Laurence Horn
laurence.horn at YALE.EDU
Tue Mar 18 00:35:51 UTC 2003
At 4:09 PM -0800 3/17/03, FRITZ JUENGLING wrote:
> >>> laurence.horn at YALE.EDU 03/17/03 03:22PM >>>
>At 6:11 PM -0500 3/17/03, David Bergdahl wrote:
>
>>We didn't have those, but I thought "short o" was the vowel of "dog"
>>and "laundry" as opposed to that of "log", "frog", and "father".
>>Hard to remember, though.
>>larry
>
>Those are all the same for me.
>Fritz
Right, but for those who round the vowel of "dog" but not that of the
other words in the group, it makes a certain kind of sense to retain
the name "short o" for the rounded open-o vowel of "dog", while using
some "a" vowel label (but not "long a!") for the unrounded one in
"log", "father", etc. I remember college dictionaries using the
a-with-two-dots-on-it (formally, but not functionally, an umlaut) for
that one, and an o-with-a-breve for the "dog" vowel, usually with a
note somewhere about variation. Or maybe the dictionaries used the
o-breve for "log" and "frog" too, and included a note to the effect
that some speakers (like me) pronounce those words with the
a-double-dot-on-top.
larry
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list