Haf and have

Mark A Mandel mam at THEWORLD.COM
Tue Mar 25 17:00:46 UTC 2003


On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Laurence Horn wrote:

#But it hasta be lexical/morphological, not purely phonological, given
#the voicing in e.g.

Quite so. I said "owing to the loss of word boundary", but of course
then I shouldn't've said "<purely> phonological".

-- Mark M.



More information about the Ads-l mailing list