Re: Re: WNI (word not in)

[RonButters at AOL.COM]

In a message dated 10/17/04 6:17:48 PM, laurence.horn at YALE.EDU writes:


> "unxeroxable" [1560 google hits]--or
> "unxeroxability" [no hits, but available for "coinage" as
> necessary]--which I like to use as an illustration of productive
> morphology and well-formed but unlisted lexical items.
>
> Larry
>

Thanks for the example--I will use it Tuesday in my Intro class. Maybe along
with pseudouxorious?