Hinky Dinky
Douglas G. Wilson
douglas at NB.NET
Thu Sep 23 05:10:16 UTC 2004
I wonder: why "sous-lieutenant"? Wouldn't "second lieutenant" fit OK?
Wasn't "second lieutenant" the name of this rank in the US in WW I times?
This stanza presents the 77th as a very small or under-strength unit
consisting of exactly two enlisted men and one officer of the very lowest
rank; maybe "sous-lieutenant" was a conventional jocular term for "[second]
lieutenant" (maybe because it sounds like "sou-lieutenant" and the French
sou of the time apparently was a very small coin, approx. one cent).
Here are a bunch of stanzas:
http://www.mudcat.org/thread.cfm?threadid=2385
-- Doug Wilson
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list