Inner Prescriptivism

[RonButters at AOL.COM]

Some of these are things that were drummed into us by our pre-college 
teachers, and some seem to me to be matters of changes taking place in the language. 
For example, my internal grammar makes a strong may/might distinction, but I 
have no memory of having been formally taught the difference. Yet this seems to 
be something that is increasingly disappearing among younger folk. This also 
curdles my mental milk, despite my descriptivist allegiances.

On the other hand, I remember being taught that COUPON has no [j] after the 
initial [k], and (most especially) that just because a personal pronoun occurs 
after the conjunction AND, that should not automatically trigger the objective 
case. Even so, I hear many of my colleagues--English professors in a 
Department that fancies itself one of the premier Departments in the world--who say 
things like, "Just between you and I." This also curdles my mental milk, 
bigtime.

Then there is ENDIVE, which always triggers some hesitation. This was not a 
word that I learned until I was 30, and to this day I cannot remember what the 
dictionaries say about it. My rule here is, "When in doubt, Anglicize."

COUPON, on the other hand, doesn't trouble me any more than the two 
pronunciations of ECONOMICS or the three pronunciations of ENVELOPE.

In a message dated 12/4/05 8:19:46 AM, preston at MSU.EDU writes:


> Since all sociolinguists know (as apparently some others ignore) that
> language is a major key to your own and others' identity (with all
> the sociodemographic baggage that "identity" carries), I assume it
> would be impossible when linguists are behaving as real people for
> them not to have many of the associations, prejudices, and so on that
> mere mortals do.
> 
> I freely confess to an inner shudder at a /j/ in "coupon" and a
> "harrrumphing" at "disinterested" (in the incorrect sense, of
> course), but my analytic brain can quickly put aside (although not
> erase) my more visceral one. (Some of you may not like "visceral
> brain.")
> 
> I'm pretty sure such a study would reveal just such preferences among
> nearly all of us; I'm not sure the findings would lead to the same
> cynical conclusion that the discovery of a closet preference for dead
> white European male authors does. If I found an application of my
> preferences in practice (grading, even evaluating others in
> short-term acquaintance), I would worry. I have only my introspection
> of my practices to go on, but I find myself, and I suspect most other
> linguists, pretty clean.
> 
> dInIs
> 
> >Jesse Sheidlower just referred in a posting to his "inner prescriptivist."
> >I notice that it is not uncommon for linguists and lexicographers on this
> >list to criticize pet-peeve linguistic usages, contrary to the usual
> >descriptivist ideology of linguistic scholars.  I wonder whether there
> >have ever been any studies done of closet prescriptivism among linguists.
> >(I did see a study a few years ago revealing that members of the UCLA
> >English Department, in their own private reading for pleasure, actually
> >preferred the literature of dead white European males.)
> >
> >Fred Shapiro
> >
> >
> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >Fred R. Shapiro                             Editor
> >Associate Librarian for Collections and     YALE DICTIONARY OF QUOTATIONS
> >   Access and Lecturer in Legal Research     Yale University Press,
> >Yale Law School                             forthcoming
> >e-mail: fred.shapiro at yale.edu               http://quotationdictionary.com
> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> --
> Dennis R. Preston
> University Distinguished Professor
> Department of English
> 15-C Morrill Hall
> Michigan State University
> East Lansing, MI 48824-1036
> Phone: (517) 353-4736
> Fax: (517) 353-3755
> preston at msu.edu
> 
>