gunsel

Jonathan Lighter wuxxmupp2000 at YAHOO.COM
Mon Jan 10 23:17:07 UTC 2005


Seems to me that "gunsel" was already in Hammett's 1929 novel, and that the emergent sense of "gunman" owes a lot to the 1941 film. A "gunsel" was, essentially, a "raw youth" and did not always imply homosexuality.

Cf. the precisely similar range of meanings attached to "punk." The latter is almost unquestionably from the 16th-century term for a prostitute or kept mistress - eventually extended in prison and similar situations to young men.

JL

"Arnold M. Zwicky" <zwicky at CSLI.STANFORD.EDU> wrote:
---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
Sender: American Dialect Society
Poster: "Arnold M. Zwicky"
Subject: Re: gunsel
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Jan 10, 2005, at 10:45 AM, Bill Mullins wrote:

> As far as "The Maltese Falcon" goes, I believe you are right. But Cook
> seems to be the stereotype of the second OED defintion, as well -- a
> cheap hood whose job it is to shoot, or get shot. Check out his
> listings in the IMDB.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> Sender: American Dialect Society
>> Poster: paulzjoh

>> Subject: Re: gunsel
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> I thought that Bogart was calling Cook a faggot when he said gunsel.
>> When I first saw the movie I was too young to know about
>> homosexuality, little else sex, but rewatching the movie on
>> TV, it seems that there is a Hollywood euphuism at work there.

as i understand the situation, the writers wanted to get the 'catamite'
attribution across, but were having trouble finding an expression they
could get past the studio. then the yiddishly knowledgable among them
realized that "gunsel" might work, because most viewers would connect
it to "gun", the character Wilmer being a gun-toting hoodlum. this
seems to have succeeded, and produced a 'gunslinger' reading for
"gunsel".

so, not euphemism (or euphuism, for that matter), but a kind of
deliberate invitation to misunderstanding, conveying one apparent
meaning to most people while getting another meaning across to the
insiders.

arnold


---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 The all-new My Yahoo! – Get yours free!



More information about the Ads-l mailing list