Who'd a thunk it?

[sagehen]

>On Jun 29, 2005, at 11:22 PM, Wilson Gray wrote:
>
>> FWIW, I think that "supposably" sounds "ignunt." But I've been in love
>> with "hopefully" from the day that we met. I've never understood why
>> some people wish to argue against its use. In fact, I've never even
>> understood the points of those arguments. Different strokes for
>> different folks, to coin a phrase.
>
>not very surprising.  for "supposably" there already is a one-word
>equivalent ("supposedly"), but there is no such equivalent for
>"hopefully".  so "hopefully" is really useful in a way that
>"supposably" is not.
>
>arnold
~~~~~~~~~~
Yeah, but........"I hope,"  "we hope,"  "one hopes" are all SHORTER than
"hopefully" and "it is hoped" is no longer!
Still squirming uncomfortably here in the corner,
AM


~@:>   ~@:>   ~@:>   ~@:>