malaprop? or what?
Laurence Horn
laurence.horn at YALE.EDU
Wed May 4 14:50:09 UTC 2005
>I'm with Arnold on this one. You can "jump on the bandwagon" or
>have a "bandwagon effect," but the quoted ex. had me baffled until
>David suggested an paraphrase.
>
>David, if "bandwagon" has been concretized into "an idea that has
>gained momentum," would sentences like the following be idiomatic
>for you ?
>
>1. ? Social security reform is clearly becoming a bandwagon.
>
>2. ? Steroid testing for lexicographers? That's a bandwagon nowadays.
or, if you prefer, "That's a bandwagon anymore."
>
>How about an adj.:
>
> 3. ? ST for Ls is becoming bandwagon.
beyond the pale
>Hmmm. The more I say them, the more normal they sound. HELP MEEEEEEE!!!!!!
>
>JL
>
>David Bowie <db.list at PMPKN.NET> wrote:
>---------------------- Information from the mail header
>-----------------------
>Sender: American Dialect Society
>Poster: David Bowie
>Subject: Re: malaprop? or what?
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>From: "Arnold M. Zwicky"
>
>> from an NYT story "Trailer-Park Dwellers Fight Eviction From
>> Paradise" by Chris Dixon, 5/2/05, p. A12 (the paradise in question is
>> the beach at Laguna Beach, California):
>> -----
>> ...with a slice of paradise on the line, most residents have chosen
>> to fight.
>
>> "They're pulling this old bandwagon that's long dead and not true,"
>> said Tim Williams, 36, who has lived at El Morro for nearly four
>> years with his wife, Dalila, and their son, Sebastian, 5. "Saying
>> people are denied access--that's a lie."
>> -----
>> ok, "bandwagon" is clearly not the word for the job. something like
>> "canard" would fit. but what word was this guy aiming for? (or,
>> alternatively, what did he say that the reporter misheard as
>> "bandwagon"?)
>
>"Bandwagon" works for me--what's wrong with it? Is it clear in the story
>that he's not talking about an idea that has gained momentum (which is,
>to me, the general sense of the word)?
>
>--
>David Bowie http://pmpkn.net/lx
>Jeanne's Two Laws of Chocolate: If there is no chocolate in the
>house, there is too little; some must be purchased. If there is
>chocolate in the house, there is too much; it must be consumed.
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list