BULLOCKS - euph/typo/LA pron.?
Peter A. McGraw
pmcgraw at LINFIELD.EDU
Wed May 4 16:49:24 UTC 2005
And I'm sorry to report that my big Nederlands Koenen (M.J. Koenen & J.B.
Drewes, Verklarend Handwoordenboek der Nederlandse Taal, 27th ed.) gives no
evidence of a word *pappekak, *pappenkak, *papkak or any other compound of
pap and kak in contemporary Dutch. So I guess the etymology of poppycock
will have to be sought elsewhere.
Peter Mc.
--On Wednesday, May 4, 2005 10:58 AM -0400 Laurence Horn
<laurence.horn at YALE.EDU> wrote:
>> isn't "papekak" [sic] soft dung/excrement rather than the dried-up
>> variety? Any Dutch speakers on the list?
>
> ...and I've since acknowledged that the spelling should have been
> "pappekak"
*****************************************************************
Peter A. McGraw Linfield College McMinnville, Oregon
******************* pmcgraw at linfield.edu ************************
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list