"soon before"?
Wilson Gray
wilson.gray at RCN.COM
Wed May 18 22:48:05 UTC 2005
On May 18, 2005, at 5:07 PM, Arnold M. Zwicky wrote:
> ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> -----------------------
> Sender: American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Poster: "Arnold M. Zwicky" <zwicky at CSLI.STANFORD.EDU>
> Subject: Re: "soon before"?
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------
>
> On May 18, 2005, at 1:20 PM, Alison Murie wrote:
>
>> Seymour Hersh in /Chain of Command/ on pp. 355-6 writes:
>> "....security official said in an interview _soon before_ the
>> transfer of
>> sovereignty that..." [my emphasis].
>> This looks & sounds very odd to me; I would expect _shortly
>> before_here.
>
> "shortly" is fine, but "soon" sounds perfectly good to me here. in
> wh questions of extent, with "how", "soon" is very common: "How soon
> before the game did you arrive?"
>
On the other hand, "How shortly before the game did you arrive?" is
D.O.A.
-Wilson
> outside of contexts with "how", "soon before" is common, though not
> nearly as connon as "shortly before" or "soon after". in raw google
> web hits:
>
> --> "soon before" -how: ca. 31,900
> "soon after" -how: ca. 2,670,000
>
> "shortly before": ca. 2,960,000
> "shortly after": ca. 11,400,000
>
> here, "after" has the edge over "before". modified by "just" or
> "long", however, "before" has the edge, though not as big an edge:
>
> "just before": ca. 9,770,000
> "just after": ca. 4,440,000
>
> "long before": ca. 8,510,000
> "long after": ca. 5,260,000
>
> (overall, "before" and "after" are roughly the same in frequency,
> 894m and 882m.)
>
> admittedly, "soon before" (marked with an accusatory arrow above) is
> very low compared to the other combinations. so there does seem to
> be some dispreference. or even the possibility that some speakers
> have an odd gap in the pattern of modifying "before"/"after" by
> "soon"/"shortly"/"just"/"long".
>
> in general, i have no idea where these asymmetries come from.
>
> arnold (zwicky at csli.stanford.edu)
>
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list