juxtaposition (v.)

Jonathan Lighter wuxxmupp2000 at YAHOO.COM
Wed Sep 21 13:07:20 UTC 2005


So let me get this straight. It's okay to refer to women as "girls" as long as your brain is spelling it "grrls" and they're babeular. Is that right ?

JL

Benjamin Zimmer <bgzimmer at RCI.RUTGERS.EDU> wrote:
---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
Sender: American Dialect Society
Poster: Benjamin Zimmer
Subject: Re: juxtaposition (v.)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:39:36 -0400, Benjamin Zimmer wrote:

>>From a recent addition to the Snopes urban legend website:
>
>-----
>http://www.snopes.com/katrina/photos/whatswrong.asp
>These photographs may not actually depict what their captions proclaim,
>but they do represent a general sort of truth. Whether that truth matches
>the social commentary implied by their juxtapositioning is another
>matter.
>-----
>
>Nothing in OED/MWCD/AHD/RHUD for "juxtaposition" as a verb. Exx. of the
>verbal noun "juxtapositioning" and the participial adj. "juxtapositioned"
>are fairly common on the Web. Oftentimes these forms are apparently just
>fancy ways of saying "positioning"/"positioned" (cf. "quintessential" =
>'essential', "penultimate" = 'ultimate', "epicenter" = 'center', etc.).

OED3 does actually have a cite for "juxtapositioning", under "grrrl"...

-----
1998 Entertainm. Weekly 1 May 76/4 The juxtapositioning gets at the heart
of the grrl politic: A woman can be fun and babeular and still be sharp.
Like a kitten with a whip.
-----


--Ben Zimmer

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com



More information about the Ads-l mailing list