An early "cock"?
Joel S. Berson
Berson at ATT.NET
Fri Jun 30 13:49:36 UTC 2006
At 6/29/2006 07:49 PM, JL wrote [excerpted]:
> Third. None of the various details in the lyric are obviously
> inconsistent with the presumed double-entendre.
Jonathan, can we have a learned dissertation on none of the details
being "obviously inconsistent" with the unmentionable sense? Most of
them do not need explication, but I have wondered about:
>his legs be of azure
>so gentil and so small
[This can't be "blue balls". What are the legs, and why azure?]
>his spurs are of silver white
>into the wortewale
[I suppose I can imagine "wortwale"--after looking it up!--but spurs
of silver white?]
>his eyes are of crystal
>locked all in amber
[More than one eye?]
And what does "comen" signify in the first and second verses?
...
> To take a vaguely comparable modern example. The heroine of the
> Ian Fleming classic _Goldfinger_ is named "Pussy Galore." Yep,
> that's her name, and it was her name in the '64 movie too. In an
> era when the sexual sense of Ms. Galore's Christian name was
> ordinarily unutterable in a Hollywood film, was its presence a
> Bawdy Joke or a Meaningless Accident ?
Just as much of an accident as its use in "Are You Being Served".
Joel
------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list