army ranks
Jonathan Lighter
wuxxmupp2000 at YAHOO.COM
Wed Mar 29 14:20:53 UTC 2006
For those for whom no knowledge is too much, OED gives the following primary dates for general-officer ranks :
1514 captain-general
1576 general
1579 sergeant-general
1589 lieutenant-general
1595 colonel-general
1633 major-general
1681 general officer
1690 brigadier-general
A "sergeant-general" is now a "sergeant-major," though it was also applied to unspecified senior commanders in some foreign armies. The chronology shows that I was mistaken in assuming (yeah, I know the folk etymology) that "general" comes from "general officer."
However, the chronology also suggests that the hierarchy of rank is *not* based on any systematic application of the names of enlisted grades. "General" appears to have been a nominalization (by clipping) of the postpositive adj. in "captain-general." A "lieutenant-general" was evidently conceived of as a general's subordinate or lieutenant. A "colonel-general" was one step lower than a full general, and (logically this time) a "major-general" was a step below the colonel-general. A "brigadier-general," which OED believes to antedate "brigadier" is a lower-ranked general in command of a brigade.
So it's all sort of a patchwork.
JL
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.
------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list