True Blue --now "CHICKEN"

[Jonathan Lighter]

Q: Is a barnyard goose a "fowl" in the U.S. (No puns, smart guy!)  If not, why not?
  Who makes these rules?

  JL

Charles Doyle <cdoyle at UGA.EDU> wrote:
  ---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
Sender: American Dialect Society
Poster: Charles Doyle
Subject: Re: True Blue --now "CHICKEN"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I.e., 1827 for CHICKEN n.1.1.d, "A domestic fowl of any age"? That seems like a poor definition. Turkeys and ducks are domestic fowl, but they aren't referred to as chickens.

Why, in the OED (s.v. CHICKEN "Additions Series 1993") does CHICKEN-BREAST gain an entry, when "chicken-leg," "chicken-wing," and the names of other edible chicken parts do not?

--Charlie
__________________________________________________

---- Original message ----
>Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 14:54:29 -0800
>From: Jonathan Lighter
>Subject: Re: True Blue
>To: ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

>
>Assuming that "ram-chicken" simply means "rooster," it antedates the modern use of "chicken" in OED (1812) by about two generations.
>
> JL

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org



---------------------------------
Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org