"must do"
Arnold M. Zwicky
zwicky at CSLI.STANFORD.EDU
Tue Nov 14 15:57:41 UTC 2006
On Nov 14, 2006, at 7:15 AM, Jon Lighter wrote:
> Maybe we discussed this nuance of British "do" once before, but
> this ex. strikes me as so cotton-pickin' weird that I must vent:
>
> 1988 Peter Henry, Liv Tudge, et al., trans. _From the
> Reminiscences of Private Ivanov_ by Vsevolod Garshin (London: Angel
> Books) 27: Does it really hurt that much ? It must do.
>
> "Must _do_"? "Must _do_"? What the heck is that ? I see no exx.
> in OED. In theory it fits under _must_ 3.a.(a) "with following
> infinitive," but my native sense of _langue_ tells me "do" can't
> follow "must" in answer to a "do" question.
>
> Ye Syntacticians and Grammatologists: describe ! Ye Philosophers
> of Tongues: justify if you can !
this is a very well-known difference between american and british
english, and there's a fair amount of literature about it.
the Cambridge Grammar of the English Language has a compact
discussion on pp. 100-101. Huddleston suggests there that american
english has DO behaving like an auxiliary in what they call the Code
construction -- the construction is elliptical -- while british
english has DO behaving like a pro-form.
just two different ways of doing things.
arnold
------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list