New meanings for pornography?

David Bergdahl dlbrgdhl at GMAIL.COM
Sun Oct 29 20:36:03 UTC 2006


Charles & Ron have it exactly right: "R-rated" material is not considered
pornographic, only "XXX" material.
-db

On 10/29/06, RonButters at aol.com <RonButters at aol.com> wrote:
>
> ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> -----------------------
> Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Poster:       RonButters at AOL.COM
>
> Subject:      =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re:=20=A0=20=A0=20=A0=20[ADS-L]=20New=20meanings=2
>               0?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?for=20pornography=3F?=
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I think that Charlie Doyle is right in his post when he says that
> pornograph=
> y=20
> implies illegality for many people. And it is also the case that not
> every=20
> attempt at sexual titilation is pornography, and what constitutes
> prurience=20=
> is a=20
> matter of taste. I suspect that what this young woman meant was that
> her=20
> costume was not beyond acceptable levels of sexual titilationosity, and
> that=
> she=20
> would not expect normal people to find it prurient. There are, for
> instance,=
> an=20
> enormous number of print advertisements for normal products such as=20
> undergarments, perfumes, and colognes that are quite erotic but most
> people,=
> I think,=20
> would not call them pornographic.
>
> I have not done a survey, but I suspect that a very large percentage of
> the=20
> American public today--maybe a majority (depending on the ages of the=20
> interviewees) would not consider anything pornography that did not involve
> a=
> t least=20
> naked below-the-belt genitals and/or simulated or actual sexual
> intercourse=20=
> of=20
> one sort or another. Soft-core pornography generally involves simulated
> sex.
>
> I'd call PLAYBOY risqu=E9, but not pornographic (as I remember it).
>
> In a message dated 10/27/06 9:00:08 AM, db.list at PMPKN.NET writes:
>
> >=20
> > =A0=A0 "'It's not like it's pornography,' said Pamela Runsick, 22,
> > =A0 =A0 a senior from Melbourne majoring in advertising and public
> > =A0 =A0 relations, who stripped down to a black lace bra, panties
> > =A0 =A0 and high heels for a test shoot. 'It's Playboy. It's
> > =A0 =A0 glamorous.'"
> >=20
> > Since any definition of "pornography" i've ever run across before seems
> > to have, at core, the purpose of some sort of sexual titillation or
> > prurience involved, it seems to me that Playboy counts.
> >=20
> >=20
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org



More information about the Ads-l mailing list