Piraha
Wilson Gray
hwgray at GMAIL.COM
Wed Apr 18 17:05:41 UTC 2007
Isn't "They can count only to two" an antiquated fallacy, based on a
misunderstaning of the way that the culture uses number, that was
first applied to the languages of Australia a century ago? I seem to
remember a discussion of this claim as a fallacy in Pei's book, The
Story of Language. Of course, I am more than aware that no "real"
linguist takes anything that ol' Mario has to say seriously. I first
heard his ideas shat upon by barracks-mates at the old Army Language
School back in 1960.
And yes, I have read Colapinto's article.
-Wilson
On 4/18/07, Jonathan Lighter <wuxxmupp2000 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> ---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
> Sender: American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Poster: Jonathan Lighter <wuxxmupp2000 at YAHOO.COM>
> Subject: Piraha
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Cause your linguistics students to read John Colapinto's "The Interpreter" in the current _New Yorker_ (Apr. 16).
>
> It's about the Amazonian people whose language only counts to two. Many other odd linguistic and sociolinguistic elements are described also.
>
> JL
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
> Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>
--
All say, "How hard it is that we have to die"---a strange complaint to
come from the mouths of people who have had to live.
-----
-Sam'l Clemens
"Experience" is the ability to recognize a mistake when you make it again.
------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list