"like" avoidance/correction
Laurence Horn
laurence.horn at YALE.EDU
Fri Apr 27 18:48:40 UTC 2007
At 2:26 PM -0400 4/27/07, Wilson Gray wrote:
>As Elvis once put it, "Now and then, there's a fool such as I."
>
>-Wilson
while Joe Cocker poses (if not begs) the musical question, "What are
you doing with a fool like me?"
LH
>On 4/26/07, Arnold M. Zwicky <zwicky at csli.stanford.edu> wrote:
>>---------------------- Information from the mail header
>>-----------------------
>>Sender: American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
>>Poster: "Arnold M. Zwicky" <zwicky at CSLI.STANFORD.EDU>
>>Subject: Re: "like" avoidance/correction
>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>On Apr 26, 2007, at 2:15 PM, Matthew Gordon wrote:
>>
>>> On last night's Newshour, Gwen Ifill started a question with
>>> "like", then
>>> self-repaired:
>>> "Like with every other case - As with every other case we're
>>> looking at this
>>> term, it seems that we are watching to see what Chief Justice Roberts
>>> does..."
>>> Only the corrected version appears in the transcript:
>>> http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/law/jan-june07/campaignads_04-25.html
>>>
>>> Is this a context where the traditional proscription of 'like'
>>> applies? I
>>> thought it was its use as a conjunction that people objected to.
>>
>>"like" as a subordinating conjunction would combine with a clause
>>(though perhaps an elliptical one), as a P with NPs, but here it's
>>combining with a PP. MWDEU treats this as a conjunctive use, the
>>last of the four subtypes it lists. MWDEU has examples, from
>>reputable sources, of
>> like in bad MGM musicals
>> like on most boats
>> like on the Johnny Carson show
>> like under the present scheme
>> just like in the movies
>>
>>it doesn't explain why the PP examples are "conjunctive", nor does it
>>note that Ps can sometimes have PP objects ("from under the table").
>>perhaps the authors thought that the PP in "like" + PP is really an
>>elliptical clause (corresponding to a full clause along the lines of
>>"it is PP"). in any case, MWDEU lumps these in with more obviously
>>conjunctive instances of "like" -- which it doesn't disparage ("the
>>usage has never been less than standard, even if primarily spoken").
>>
>>> Perhaps
>>> partial recollection of the traditional proscription is combining
>>> with more
>>> modern condemnation of "like" as a discourse marker stereotypically
>>> associated with young (Californian) women to feed avoidance of
>>> likes of any
>>> stripe in formal context. Almost certainly I'm not the first to
>>> suggest
>>> this, and I'd welcome relevant citations as well as further examples.
>>
>>i don't know about the role of discourse-marker (and quotative)
>>"like" in any of this, but condemnation of conjunctive "like" has
>>been around ever since the usage became fairly common, in the 19th
>>century (attestations go back 600 years or so).
>>
>>most of the larger handbooks note hypercorrect "as" for the P "like",
>>as in "He was built as a swordfish" (Hemingway).
>>
>>> I consider our local NPR station's use of "listeners such as you"
>>> in their
>>> funding acknowledgments to be another case.
>>
>>"such as" isn't hypercorrect here, because it's not incorrect. it's
>>just a more formal (or tonier) alternative to the P "like" (but see
>>below). for a little discussion, see this posting of mine (which
>>also treats the untriggered reflexive "myself"):
>>
>>AZ, 9/5/05: Someone like me, someone such as myself:
>> http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/002458.html
>>
>>> And, I recently found a more egregious example in a student paper:
>>> "In my research into other libraries such as the Kemper Memorial
>>> Library, I
>>> have made some observations..."
>>> The Kemper Library is the church library at the local Newman
>>> Center, and
>>> what the student meant is that she researched similar libraries in
>>> other
>>> parishes.
>>
>>now this one really is a hypercorrection, i think.
>>
>>the deeper issue is that what's going on is not just a choice between
>>"like", "as", and "such as" *in general*, but a choice *in specific
>>meanings*. "as" and "such as" are particularly good for giving
>>exemplars, and "like" for expressing resemblance. but these uses can
>>overlap (as in the "listeners X you" example above). sometimes,
>>though, there's really no choice. in the Kemper Library case,
>>there's really only one possibility for a restrictive modifier with
>>the resemblance sense --
>> other libraries, such as the KML, [exemplar] (appositive modifier)
>> other libraries, like the KML, [exemplar] (appositive modifier)
>>
>> other libraries like the KML [resemblance] (restrictive modifier)
>>
>>in slightly different syntactic contexts you can get
>> other libraries, like the KML, [resemblance] (appositive modifier)
>>as in:
>> Other libraries, like the KML, restrict access to their shelves.
>>("like" here is a P with an object NP that actually denotes a
>>proposition, rather than an individual -- like "after" and "before"
>>in "I left just after Kim, so Kim left just before me".)
>>
>>arnold
>>
>>------------------------------------------------------------
>>The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>>
>
>
>--
>All say, "How hard it is that we have to die"---a strange complaint to
>come from the mouths of people who have had to live.
>-----
> -Sam'l Clemens
>------
>The tongue has no bones, yet it breaks bones.
>
> Rumanian proverb
>
>------------------------------------------------------------
>The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list