successor = 'predecessor'

Jonathan Lighter wuxxmupp2000 at YAHOO.COM
Mon Dec 17 15:53:28 UTC 2007


I'm starting to feel like T. H. White's Merlin - livin' backward in time!

  JL

Charles Doyle <cdoyle at UGA.EDU> wrote:
  ---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
Sender: American Dialect Society
Poster: Charles Doyle
Subject: successor = 'predecessor'
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It's somewhat like the confusion of "ancestor" with "descendant"--

In yesterday's newspaper an AP story by Hillary Rhodes reported that the name "Emma" for new babies, after three years in first place, has been overtaken by "Sophia" and "Isabella":

"Sophia has more of a Latin or continental appeal than its proper English successor, Emma" (_Athens [GA] Banner-Herald_, E12).

Unlike the "ancestor"/"descendant" pair, however, "successor" and "predecessor" do have the same root word--a circumstance that might contribute to their confusability.

--Charlie
_____________________________________________________________

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org



---------------------------------
Never miss a thing.   Make Yahoo your homepage.

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org



More information about the Ads-l mailing list