In the December Vocabula Now Online: Them's Crying Words
Arnold M. Zwicky
zwicky at CSLI.STANFORD.EDU
Mon Dec 17 17:23:37 UTC 2007
On Dec 16, 2007, at 7:24 AM, Larry Horn wrote:
> At 7:38 AM -0500 12/16/07, The Vocabula Review wrote:
>>
>> decimate, to v. For the information of journalists and for all
>> radio and TV presenters: to "decimate" a group of people or things
>> does not mean to kill, destroy, ravage, defeat, or lay waste all or
>> most of that group...
and goes on to point out absurdities in Peter Bowler's discussion.
MWDEU has a wonderful sharp-tongued discussion of the word, noting
that (a) the proscribed sense is attested since (at least) 1663; (b)
people have been complaining about this usage since (at least) Richard
Grant White in 1870; and (c) there are apparently *no* attested uses
of the verb in the meaning 'reduce by one-tenth' (which is not
surprising, because there just aren't that many occasions on which
you'd actually want such a verb).
what interests me about the whole matter is the widespread passion
with which the usage is condemned. it's an enduring peeve fashion
(with a longer history even than speaker-oriented "hopefully").
arnold
------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list