"we" [was: Another kind of buddy: ''guy'']

[Jonathan Lighter]

"Guy" has been America's slang/colloquial term of choice for male human beings for well over a century; so more specific nuances are inevitable. (Gays look for "guys." So do "gals." Is that linguistically noteworthy? Dunno.)

  HDAS lacks a separate definition for vocative "guy" because it seemed unnecessary. That may have been a hasty decision.

  But the year to beat (shouldn't be difficult) is 1915.

  JL

Doug Harris <cats22 at FRONTIERNET.NET> wrote:
  ---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
Sender: American Dialect Society
Poster: Doug Harris
Subject: Re: "we" [was: Another kind of buddy: ''guy'']
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"...all men are created equal..."
Thomas Jefferson (Mr. Do As I Say But Not As I Do)




Having recently visited Monticello, I applaud Jefferson's
solution for dining at home: a rotating, shelved pass-through, to
keep the kitchen personnel invisible; only those few serving at table
were present in the dining room.

Perhaps those in charge should bring "you all" to the north.

Joel


They may _send_ y'all (the phrase) to the north, but don't _bring_ it:
We have too many 'in charge' already!

(the other) doug

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org



---------------------------------
Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV.

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org