f**** buddy euphemism?
neil
neil at TYPOG.CO.UK
Tue Jun 19 15:26:07 UTC 2007
As the original poster, I can assure Frank that the word holds no terrors.
My reticence was because I was not sure whether 'nanny' filters would
prevent the posting arriving with the header in full.
Neil Crawford
> From: Frank Abate <FABATE at CINCI.RR.COM>
> Reply-To: American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 10:39:47 -0400
> To: <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Subject: Re: f**** buddy euphemism?
>
> ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> -----------------------
> Sender: American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Poster: Frank Abate <FABATE at CINCI.RR.COM>
> Subject: Re: f**** buddy euphemism?
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
-
>
> It is quite amusing to me that ADS posters seem to feel sheepish about
> having:
>
>
>
> FUCK
>
>
>
> . . . in the Subject line.
>
>
>
> Why is this? Do you taboo?
>
>
>
> The term is fuck buddy. Can't we post it thus?
>
>
>
>
>
> Fac eu ('Be well'; Latin/Greek)
>
>
>
>
>
> Frank Abate
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>
------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list