"vampire" from 1688?

Bonnie Taylor-Blake taylor-blake at NC.RR.COM
Mon May 28 19:33:02 UTC 2007

I had written:

> Forman, however, was writing from Paris in January, 1733 (see
> "Forman2," below).  The first three pages of the chapter in which
> "Vampires of the Publick" appears can be found for a while at
> http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l275/BonnieTB/Forman2.jpg
> http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l275/BonnieTB/Forman3.jpg
> http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l275/BonnieTB/Forman4.jpg

I now see that Katharina M. Wilson's "The History of the Word 'Vampire'"
(*Journal of the History of Ideas* 46[4]:  577-583 [1985]) holds that,


Ten years later, in 1688, the term must have been fairly well known, because
Forman, in his *Observations on the Revolution in 1688*, written in the same
year and published in 1741, used the term in a footnote metaphorically
without attaching any explanation to it. [p. 580]


And Wilson gives the text of that footnote, citing that it appeared in
Forman's _Observations on the Revolution in 1668 (1741), 11.

Which strikes me as curious, because not only does the first page of
Forman's letter (p. 9 of the book) indicates that he was writing from Paris
in January, 1733, but Forman mentions on that same page works he wrote in
July, 1731.  And on the very page Wilson specifically references -- three
pages into Forman's letter -- Forman mentions Addison's "69th Spectator."
Which was published on May 19, 1711.

-- Bonnie

The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org

More information about the Ads-l mailing list