Proposal: A separate antedatings list

[ronbutters at AOL.COM]

It is ironic that all these strictly lexicographical matters are posted to the "dialect" list & not the DSNA. It is largely just a matter of history, but also: does DSNA archive its entries? And if so, & if we posted antedatings and culinary terms there, archive searchers would have to enter their searches 3 times instead of 2 (which Jesse S thinks somehow would be more inconvenient than having to delete numerous unwanted messages every day).
Have I exceeded my 10 messages per week limit or is Sunday a new week?

Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis Preston <preston at MSU.EDU>

Date:         Sun, 4 Nov 2007 08:44:03
To:ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject:      Re: [ADS-L] Proposal: A separate antedatings list


I agree with Lynne. Doesn't the DSNA have a list (if not, it should)
in which matters lexicographical could be discussed? (Dialect
lexicographers might want to get both.)

dInIs

>---------------------- Information from the mail header
>-----------------------
>Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
>Poster:       Lynne Murphy <m.l.murphy at SUSSEX.AC.UK>
>Subject:      Re: Proposal: A separate antedatings list
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>I receive ADS-L in digest form, and usually skip a whole day's digest if I
>see that the titles are mostly about antedatings and local food terms.  I'm
>sure I miss a lot that would've been worth my while to read, but it's a
>pain to click through all those messages to get to the potentially
>interesting ones when I know that I've got 50 other messages that need to
>be read in my inbox each morning.  So, I'll go against what seems to be the
>flow here and say that I would welcome a separate antedatings list.
>
>Lynne
>
>--On Sunday, November 4, 2007 2:05 am +0000 ronbutters at AOL.COM wrote:
>
>>  The American Dialect Society is devoted to the study of the English
>>  language in America. So just about anything goes--but maybe in moderation?
>>
>>  Thanks, though, to those who have suggested ways of dealing with 30
>>  messages per day (15 of which usually come from the same 3 or 4 people)
>>  without taking the drastic measure of removing myself from what is
>>  certainly a VIGOROUS list. It seems clear to me that most of the people
>>  who have not signed off already like it the way it is. I still think it
>>  would be a good idea to limit everyone to perhaps ten messages a week.
>>
>>  ------Original Message------
>>  From: Joel S. Berson
>>  Sender: American Dialect Society
>>  To: ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
>>  ReplyTo: American Dialect Society
>>  Sent: Nov 3, 2007 7:10 PM
>>  Subject: Re: [ADS-L] Proposal: A separate antedatings list
>>
>>  To those who would like one or more separate lists, or those who wish
>>  to unsubscribe but have sent their requests to the wrong  list address:
>>
>>  What subjects do you propose should remain on ADS-L?
>>
>>  Joel
>>
>>  ------------------------------------------------------------
>>  The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>>
>>
>>  Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
>
>
>Dr M Lynne Murphy
>Senior Lecturer in Linguistics and English Language
>Arts B135
>University of Sussex
>Brighton BN1 9QN
>
>phone: +44-(0)1273-678844
>http://separatedbyacommonlanguage.blogspot.com
>
>------------------------------------------------------------
>The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org


--
Dennis R. Preston
University Distinguished Professor
Department of English
Morrill Hall 15-C
Michigan State University
East Lansing, MI 48864 USA

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org