[antedating] "snuck" 1881

[Jonathan Lighter]

Google Books produces a few {snook}s, all of them too late to be of much interest.  I have not heard this pronunciation.

  Neither have I ever encountered _*snike_.

  I wonder if "shake/ shook" provided the inspiration, if not the precise model.

  JL

"Douglas G. Wilson" <douglas at NB.NET> wrote:
  ---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
Sender: American Dialect Society
Poster: "Douglas G. Wilson"
Subject: Re: [antedating] "snuck" 1881
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>What I wonder about it is what strong verb pattern (ablaut) is it
>being modeled on?

MWDEU has a discussion of "snuck". Apparently a candidate ancestor of
"sneak", OE "snican", is parallel to OE "strican" = "strike", so one
might expect "snike"/"snuck" like "strike"/"struck". However there's
no trace of "snike" (AFAIK) in 19th century US where "snuck"
seemingly appeared.

An alternative possibility (IMHO) would be "snuck" arising by analogy
with near-synonymous "slink"/"slunk" -- or, particularly on the
assumption of an alternative/dialectal pronunciation "snick" (cf.
"crick" = "creek", "britches" = "breeches", etc.), maybe by analogy
with "stick"/"stuck".

-- Doug Wilson


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.6/1150 - Release Date: 11/24/2007 5:58 PM

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org



---------------------------------
Be a better sports nut! Let your teams follow you with Yahoo Mobile. Try it now.

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org