gentile = ethnonymic (was: Heard on The Judges: crack)
Mark Mandel
thnidu at GMAIL.COM
Sat Apr 12 23:55:31 UTC 2008
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Arnold M. Zwicky
<zwicky at csli.stanford.edu> wrote:
> the terminology in this area seems remarkably confused. "demonym",
> "gentilic", and "ethnonym" all have some uses in the technical
> literature, but not always consistently. we need labels for (at
> least)
[rearranged as list -- m a m]
> proper nouns that refer to places (or regions or nations),
toponym
> people from those places,
> ethnic groups,
> and people belonging to those groups,
> and for the corresponding adjectives.
Forwarding to ANS-L.
> now, in the real world,
> these categorizations are related to one another in complex ways. and
> the words for particular categories also overlap, especially in their
> morphology, and these overlap with language names and names of
> religious groups and so on. it's hard to imagine a terminology that
> would allow us to keep things straight.
>
> for instance, what kind of proper [adjective] is "Turkish" in "Turkish
> invasion" 'invasion by Turkey' -- and "Turkish" in "Turkish invasion"
> 'invasion by Turks'?
>
> arnold
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>
--
Mark Mandel
------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list