semantic drift: "disrupt"
Scot LaFaive
scotlafaive at GMAIL.COM
Fri Jan 18 21:42:40 UTC 2008
Using "distrupt" makes it sound as if the car itself is the weapon. And what
does watering a car do to the bomb? Fries electrical circuits?
Scot
On Jan 18, 2008 3:23 PM, Jonathan Lighter <wuxxmupp2000 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> -----------------------
> Sender: American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Poster: Jonathan Lighter <wuxxmupp2000 at YAHOO.COM>
> Subject: semantic drift: "disrupt"
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The D.C. police are at the moment employing a bomb-squad robot called
> "Robocop" (maybe a trademark?) to investigate a suspicious vehicle. The
> police spokesperson is describing the
> procedure, which includes knocking out a window with a robotic arm, as
> "disrupting the vehicle." She says too that, once it had broken its way
> inside, the robot could fire a stream of water "to further disrupt the
> vehicle."
>
> I'd have said "neutralize," but "disrupt" seems to be the term of art.
>
> JL
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it
> now.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>
------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list