Dialect variation in the Times

[Baker, John]

        The Supreme Court has the opportunity to correct its opinions
before their publication in definitive form in United States Reports.
It will be interesting to see whether it does so in this case.


John Baker


-----Original Message-----
From: American Dialect Society [mailto:ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Laurence Horn
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 2:30 PM
To: ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Dialect variation in the Times

Nobody has yet mentioned this piece from yesterday's Week in Review at
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/29/weekinreview/29dylan.html?_r=1&scp=3&s
q=Dylan&st=nyt&oref=slogin

The Chief Justice, Dylan and the Disappearing Double Negative ADAM
LIPTAK, June 29, 2008

Four pages into his dissent on Monday in an achingly boring dispute
between pay phone companies and long distance carriers, John G.
Roberts Jr., the chief justice of the United States, put a song lyric
where the citation to precedent usually goes.

"The absence of any right to the substantive recovery means that
respondents cannot benefit from the judgment they seek and thus lack
Article III standing," Chief Justice Roberts wrote. " 'When you got
nothing, you got nothing to lose.' Bob Dylan, Like a Rolling Stone, on
Highway 61 Revisited (Columbia Records 1965)."

Alex B. Long, a law professor at the University of Tennessee and perhaps
the nation's leading authority on the citation of popular music in
judicial opinions, said this was almost certainly the first use of a
rock lyric to buttress a legal proposition in a Supreme Court decision.
"It's a landmark opinion," Professor Long said.

...
Chief Justice Roberts gets the citation wrong, proving that he is
neither an originalist nor a strict constructionist. What Mr. Dylan
actually sings, of course, is, "When you ain't got nothing, you got
nothing to lose."

It's true that many Web sites, including Mr. Dylan's official one,
reproduce the lyric as Chief Justice Roberts does. But a more careful
Dylanist might have consulted his iPod. "It was almost certainly the
clerks who provided the citation," Professor Long said. "I suppose their
use of the Internet to check the lyrics violates one of the first rules
they learned when they were all on law review: when quoting, always
check the quote with the original source, not someone else's
characterization of what the source said."

===============
I was especially interested in the question under investigation, since I
cited the same line in my ADS paper on double negation in January as an
instance of code switching between negative concord and standard
varieties, and I also checked to make sure I had the line right after
noticing, as Liptak and Long did, that it shows up in the "When you got
nothing" (as well as the "When you ain't got nothing") form on various
web sites.  I ain't got no iPod, but I did check the two "original
source" versions (live and studio) of "Like a Rolling Stone" in my
iTunes, and indeed both have negative concord, pace the Chief Justice.

LH

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org