laud/loud
Matthew Gordon
gordonmj at MISSOURI.EDU
Thu Mar 13 18:35:49 UTC 2008
Sounds like she was simply unfamiliar with the word and not a phonological
issue at all, unless she's from Pittsburgh in which case [laUd] for <laud>
could be hypercorrection inspired by their famous monophthongization of
(aw).
On 3/13/08 1:03 PM, "Herb Stahlke" <hfwstahlke at GMAIL.COM> wrote:
> An MSNBC newsreader just talked about people being [laUd at d] for good deeds.
> I suspect her writer had written <lauded> and she didn't recognize the word,
> at all or at that moment, on the teleprompter. Would an educated
> twenty-something not know the <laud>/<loud> contrast? I couldn't tell from
> her speech at the moment whether she has the low back vowel merger.
> Charitably, it could have been a slip.
>
> Herb
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list