"another thing coming"

[Brenda Lester]

FWIW: Remember Ricky Ricardo (Desi Arnez) (I LOVE LUCY)  used to say "thin" for thing?  We southerners say "nothin'."
 
bl
 


--- On Wed, 5/28/08, LanDi Liu <strangeguitars at GMAIL.COM> wrote:

From: LanDi Liu <strangeguitars at GMAIL.COM>
Subject: Re: "another thing coming"
To: ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Date: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 1:14 AM

---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
Poster:       LanDi Liu <strangeguitars at GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: "another thing coming"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FWIW, I have heard some young speakers from Utah pronounce "ng" as
[ŋg] (or [ŋg̕], and they were even aware of it and took it to be
"correct".

Randy

On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 1:18 AM, Mark Mandel <thnidu at gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------------------- Information from the mail header
-----------------------
> Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Poster:       Mark Mandel <thnidu at GMAIL.COM>
> Subject:      Re: "another thing coming"
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 12:39 PM,  <ROSESKES at aol.com> wrote:
>> I did what you said, and understand what you meant.  However, when I
say
>> "think coming" and "thing coming", they always
sound different to me.  I can
>> imagine perhaps once hearing "thing coming" and thinking
I'm hearing "think
>> coming," but not repeatedly thru'out my entire life. 
It's a common
>> expression around here, and was even more so while I was growing up. 
I'm
>> positive that what people around me have always said is,
"You've got another
>> think coming."  Things may have been different in 1919; or (which
I think is
>> more likely) the newspaper may have gotten it wrong.
>
> I agree, they are distinguishable. I slipped up and didn't say for you
> in layman's language what I said to Larry in technical terms. In
> "think coming" the first syllable is shorter, and there's a
longer
> period of silence or near-silence before the beginning of the vowel in
> "com-". But the distinction is fairly subtle and may get lost in
> hurried speech or noisy environments or other less-than-ideal
> conditions, with the result that the grammatically unusual "another
> think coming" is heard as the grammatically ordinary "another
thing
> coming". That is presumably how the "thing coming" version
got
> started: with the speaker meaning and saying "think coming", and
the
> hearer hearing it as "thing coming".
>
> Regards,
> m a m
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>



--
Randy Alexander
Jilin City, China
My Manchu studies blog:
http://www.bjshengr.com/manchu

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org


     
------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org