"little/few but" (was: "long from" for "far from")
Laurence Horn
laurence.horn at YALE.EDU
Sun Nov 30 04:08:20 UTC 2008
At 9:51 PM -0500 11/29/08, Herb Stahlke wrote:
>"few but" sounds strange, but couldn't "little but" be taken as a
>down-toned universal?
>
>Herb
Wouldn't that be essentially a label for what's happening?
Crucially, _little_ (like _few_) isn't a universal negative, yet
allows an exception. Arguably, the downtoning (or attenuation) of
the universal (_no_, _none_) that permits the exceptive is precisely
what happens when that universal negative blends with something that
isn't a universal but comes close.
LH
P.S. There's a nice "few but" on a baseball blog that alludes to the
Dryden line below (None but the brave deserve the fair), viz.
"Few But the Braves"
( http://mikesrants.baseballtoaster.com/archives/436569.html
--in reference to teams that scored 10 or more runs in 5 consecutive
games, as the Atlanta Braves did in 2006)
A couple more:
"few but the largest corporate customers consume investment banking"
or a piece describing the Magna Carta as
"a document of great importance to both England and the American
colonies, it originally granted concessions to few but the powerful
baronial families."
>
>On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Laurence Horn <laurence.horn at yale.edu> wrote:
>> ---------------------- Information from the mail header
>>-----------------------
>> Sender: American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
>> Poster: Laurence Horn <laurence.horn at YALE.EDU>
>> Subject: Re: "little/few but" (was: "long from" for "far from")
>>
>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> At 7:11 PM -0500 11/29/08, Alison Murie wrote:
>>>Quoted in an ad for /The Truth of Power/ from the blurb: "Barber
>>>believes, against the grain of conventional wisdom, that
>>> Clinton 'is a man whose democratic career is long from over.'"
>>>I don't think I've ever encountered this one before.
>>>
>> This reminds me of a construction I've found (partly by googling,
>> partly naturalistically) a lot of examples of, even though it's not
>> "supposed to" occur: _little/few but X_. (Or ditto with "except" in
>> place of "but". The usual claim (going back to the 13th century, but
>> independently discovered by many modern scholars) is that exceptives
>> of the "but" kind can only occur with universals: "everyone but
>> you", "none but the brave", "anyone but a total idiot", etc., but not
>> "someone but Bush", "many people but Obama", "most Americans but
>> McCain", etc. And presumably "Who but a total idiot..." is OK
>> because it rhetorically communicates a universal negative. But what
>> then to make of
>>
>> Does poetry matter? Few but other poets may read it.
>> --Martin Arnold, "Poets pit pens against swords", NYT 2/6/03
>> Landowners could do little but accept their fate.
>> With little except morbid thoughts to occupy his time,...
>> ...an artful yet provocative cover for her all-Bach CD in which she
>> appears to be wearing little except her violin.
>>
>> and many other examples with "little but" or "few but"? My take on
>> these is that they involve a blend of e.g. "could do little (about
>> it)" + "could do nothing but accept it".
>>
>> LH
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------
>The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list