Fwd: Past tense Spelling

Herb Stahlke hfwstahlke at GMAIL.COM
Tue Oct 28 14:24:31 UTC 2008


Wilson,

I've also seen that in print in usage guides, but I was also taught in
school that the consonant was doubled only if the syllable was
stressed, although I think they said "accented."

Herb

On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Wilson Gray <hwgray at gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
> Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Poster:       Wilson Gray <hwgray at GMAIL.COM>
> Subject:      Re: Fwd: Past tense Spelling
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Impressionly speaking, I've long had the impression - whence it
> originates, I know not - that doubling the consonant is a Briticism,
> whereas the use of the single consonant is The American Way. When I
> came across the "CANCELLED," my impression was that it was some kind
> of trivial, pswaydo-Brit, Harvard-assed, Ivy-League-fake-ism.
>
> -Wilson
>
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Joel S. Berson <Berson at att.net> wrote:
>> ---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
>> Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
>> Poster:       "Joel S. Berson" <Berson at ATT.NET>
>> Subject:      Re: Fwd: Past tense Spelling
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> At 10/27/2008 12:06 AM, Wilson Gray wrote:
>>>I think that's one of those things about which one can never tell. I
>>>grew up using "kidnaped" and "canceled." When I began to work in the
>>>Harvard library system, I noticed that I found myself dealing with a
>>>lot of material that had been _CANCELLED_ or _cancelled_. After a few
>>>years on the job, the -lled version became not only the spelling to
>>>which I was accustomed, but also the one that I now prefer.
>>
>> I either learned or developed the "rule" that if the vowel was short
>> but could also be pronounced long, then the consonant was doubled; if
>> the vowel was long but could also be pronounced short then the vowel
>> was not doubled.  This probably means "in the context of the word,
>> even though there might be no actual word with that vowel pronunciation."
>>
>> Thus "kidnap" to "kidnapped", like a short sleep but unlike the neck.
>>
>> "Travel" becomes "traveler", (about twice as many Google hits as
>> "traveller", but when there are 34 million of the latter, I suppose
>> it's acceptable).  But I would be confused about "canceled" vs.
>> "cancelled" (more than twice as many millions as
>> "canceled").  Perhaps a doubled L because one might imagine "can sealed"?
>>
>> As for "when" (David Metevia's original question), in the 18th
>> century there were fewer problems with the past tense -- many were
>> spelled with 'd.  :-)  But from my reading in the 18th century I have
>> a sense that the practice with respect to doubling changed some time
>> towards the end of the 18th century.  Not hard evidence, but perhaps
>> a time to begin looking.
>>
>> Joel
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> All say, "How hard it is that we have to die"---a strange complaint to
> come from the mouths of people who have had to live.
> -----
> -Mark Twain
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org



More information about the Ads-l mailing list