Become with Passive Voice
Laurence Horn
laurence.horn at YALE.EDU
Tue Apr 28 15:40:45 UTC 2009
At 10:49 AM -0400 4/28/09, Baker, John wrote:
> The passive voice usually requires the use of to be, or
>sometimes to get, as an auxiliary verb. Can to become, or other
>auxiliary verbs, also be used? Authoritative sources seem to differ, or
>perhaps I simply fail to understand them correctly.
>
P.S. One large set of lexical adjectives with passive participle
morphology, that co-occur with both "become" and "come" are the
"unpassives":
The package (be)came unwrapped.
My trousers have (be)come unzipped.
The plan has (be)come untracked.
Which is not to say that "come" and "become" have the same
distribution with adjectival passives; the former really needs the
"un-" prefix, even when it's redundant:
The squid (be)came unfrozen/unthawed/thawed.
The squid became thawed/*came thawed.
The knot (be)came untied/unloosened/loose/loosened.
The knot came untied/unloosened/loose/*loosened.
But "become" as a general inchoative seems to do fine with all
change-of-state (or actually result-of-change-of-state) adjectives,
including participial ones. But these are usually distinguished from
true verbal passive structures, which allow agents and such.
I don't know what the sources, authoritative and others, say, but I
imagine many of them say it with gusto.
LH
------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list