Dyslexia and English Orthography was "surprise"

[Scot LaFaive]

>So I'm wondering why so many academics enjoy using obscene or >scatalogical
terms in these "scholarly" postings.  I'm wondering if those who >ply their
rade in classrooms & libraries feel like they need to demonstrate >that they
are really pretty edgy.

Personally, I don't use vulgarity because I'm trying to look like a tough
guy. It's just my nature to use those words when I feel they express what I
want. I don't just throw them out (here anyway) willy-nilly; but I assumed
from other postings that we are all mature enough to handle the occasional
obscenity. I believe the so-called vulgar words hold a legitimate place in
language usage; I don't feel that they shouldn't be shyed away from when
they are exactly the word necessary for a given thought. I'm curious what
others have to say about the usage of obscenities and registers concerning
"adult" and "scholarly" conversation. Any other thoughts?

Scot

On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Bill Palmer <w_a_palmer at bellsouth.net>wrote:

> ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> -----------------------
> Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Poster:       Bill Palmer <w_a_palmer at BELLSOUTH.NET>
> Subject:      Re: Dyslexia and English Orthography was "surprise"
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Well, maybe these discussions are like hockey fights.  They are not what
> the
> players came for, supposedly, but they tend to keep the game clean.
>
> So I'm wondering why so many academics enjoy using obscene or scatalogical
> terms in these "scholarly" postings.  I'm wondering if those who ply their
> trade in classrooms & libraries feel like they need to demonstrate that
> they
> are really pretty edgy.
>
> Bill
>  ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Scot LaFaive" <slafaive at GMAIL.COM>
> To: <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 2:02 PM
> Subject: Re: Dyslexia and English Orthography was "surprise"
>
>
> > ---------------------- Information from the mail
> > header -----------------------
> > Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> > Poster:       Scot LaFaive <slafaive at GMAIL.COM>
> > Subject:      Re: Dyslexia and English Orthography was "surprise"
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >>So why not just ignore it?
> >
> > I think many of us have been trying to do just that for the past year or
> > so
> > (however long he's been on here), but it's difficult when 75% of what he
> > says is complete bullshit. Anyway, you are right. From now on I am going
> > to
> > try to hold to my personal promise not to waste time responding to Tom's
> > useless comments. If you find me breaking that promise, please feel free
> > to
> > chastise me.
> >
> > Scot
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 6:28 AM, Randy Alexander
> > <strangeguitars at gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> >> -----------------------
> >> Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> >> Poster:       Randy Alexander <strangeguitars at GMAIL.COM>
> >> Subject:      Re: Dyslexia and English Orthography was "surprise"
> >>
> >>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Scot LaFaive <slafaive at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > I will readily admit that Ron does speak openly, almost painfully so,
> >> about
> >> > what displeases him, but any anger directed toward Tom isn't because
> he
> >> dare
> >> > violate some traditionalist doctrine. It's because he continually says
> >> the
> >> > same thing without regard for what people more knowledgeable in the
> >> > field
> >> > than him are saying. It's like if I went on a biology forum with the
> >> little
> >> > I know of the science and proclaimed various ideas that experts in the
> >> field
> >> > knew to be false, but I didn't listen anyway and just kept on
> trucking.
> >> It's
> >> > rather offensive after awhile.
> >>
> >> So why not just ignore it?  If I see a post on some topic I'm not
> >> really interested in, I just take a quick glance at it and then hit
> >> the archive button.  At least the subject matter is something related
> >> to what the list deals with.
> >>
> >> No matter how much I think about it, I still can't see any benefit
> >> that could possibly arise from insults.  If someone insults me and I
> >> insult them back harder, can I gain from this?  Can we trace this back
> >> to flyting?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Randy Alexander
> >> Jilin City, China
> >> My Manchu studies blog:
> >> http://www.bjshengr.com/manchu
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
> >>
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org