get vs. receive/become
Jonathan Lighter
wuxxmupp2000 at GMAIL.COM
Sun Sep 20 15:54:50 UTC 2009
That should have been "received," of course.
JL
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Joel S. Berson <Berson at att.net> wrote:
> ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> -----------------------
> Sender: American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Poster: "Joel S. Berson" <Berson at ATT.NET>
> Subject: Re: get vs. receive/become
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> At 9/20/2009 11:40 AM, Jonathan Lighter wrote:
> >Fifty years ago an English teacher told us, "Never say 'get' when you mean
> >'receive' or 'become.'" That seemed pretty weird at the time and has only
> >gotten [sic] weirder.
> >
> >Yesterday a highly-educated CNN news anchor, age ca40, said (I paraphrase
> >slightly): "And we've gotten some feedback....I mean we've recieved some
> >feedback. My mother would say, '_Gotten_ ? What kind of language is that?'
> >Mom might be listening so I'd better watch my grammar. We've received
> >feedback..."
> >
> >Is this odd taboo so widespread? So terrifying that a news anchor earning
> >nine or ten figures would correct herself on the air and apologize to Mom?
> >
> >I guess yes.
>
> I would too -- that is, not earn nine or ten figures, but apologize
> to Mom. She was a high school English teacher, and would have told
> me the same, also about 50 years ago.
>
> Joel
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>
--
"There You Go Again...Using Reason on the Planet of the Duck-Billed
Platypus"
------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list