A new (to me, IAC) spelling rule
Jonathan Lighter
wuxxmupp2000 at GMAIL.COM
Tue Aug 31 23:14:42 UTC 2010
Incredibly, I've never heard of this rule either.
OED shows "bed-bug" hyphenated since 1861. MW enters it as solid.
I didn't bother to check on "dragonfly" or "damselfly."
Conceivably it's a rule insisted on by a few anal-retentive entomologists.
Just as conceivably, the letter writer has a bee in his bonnet and a wild
hair elsewhere.
JL
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Dan Goncharoff <thegonch at gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> -----------------------
> Sender: American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Poster: Dan Goncharoff <thegonch at GMAIL.COM>
> Subject: Re: A new (to me, IAC) spelling rule
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> If this were true, a June bug couldn't be a June bug...DanG
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Ann Burlingham <ann at burlinghambooks.com>
> wrote:
> > ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> -----------------------
> > Sender: American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> > Poster: Ann Burlingham <ann at BURLINGHAMBOOKS.COM>
> > Subject: Re: A new (to me, IAC) spelling rule
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Wilson Gray <hwgray at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> -----------------------
> >> Sender: American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> >> Poster: Wilson Gray <hwgray at GMAIL.COM>
> >> Subject: A new (to me, IAC) spelling rule
> >>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> I may be AFU, here, but it seems to me that there is simply no reason
> >> on earth to sit around making up this kind of nonsense and then
> >> foisting it off on the polloi as an actual rule that they have to
> >> adhere to, lest they be considered only hemi-semi-literate.
> >>
> >> One of several letters to the NYT more or less making the same empty -
> >> IMO, IAC - claim:
> >>
> >> "Bed bugs is TWO words – not one. The general rule [WTF?! If there is
> >> such a rule, why wasn't I taught it at any time between 1942, when I
> >> entered grade school, and 1954, when I (was) graduated (from) high
> >> school?] for writing out common names of insects is as follows. If the
> >> insect name is a misnomer (e.g., the dragonfly is NOT a fly and
> >> neither is a damselfly), then the whole name is written as one word.
> >> If it is not a misnomer, then it is written as two words (e.g., house
> >> fly, which is a real fly [GB: Samuelson, James. ... The Common
> >> _Housefly_. 2nd ed. London, 1860]). The bed bug is a “true” bug and
> >> therefore is two words."
> >
> > crazy as a bedbug.
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>
--
"If the truth is half as bad as I think it is, you can't handle the truth."
------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list