live, adj. = "(of entertainment) thrilling"

Dan Goncharoff thegonch at GMAIL.COM
Wed Dec 29 23:09:07 UTC 2010


I remember "filmed before a live studio audience". Yes, it's redundant.
DanG

On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Charles C Doyle <cdoyle at uga.edu> wrote:
> ---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
> Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Poster:       Charles C Doyle <cdoyle at UGA.EDU>
> Subject:      Re: live, adj. = "(of entertainment) thrilling"
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I can't swear to it, but didn't we also used to hear "recorded live before a studio audience"?
>
> --Charlie
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: American Dialect Society [ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] on behalf of Joel S. Berson [Berson at ATT.NET]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 3:59 PM
>
> At 12/29/2010 01:17 PM, Jonathan Lighter wrote:
>
>>Does "live" customarily include the notion the you're seeing them in "real
>>time" at the very instant the person/ robot/ cyborg activates the switch?
>>My life experience sez no.
>
> In the good old days (or in reruns of them), one might hear
> "broadcast live before a studio audience."
>
> Joel
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org



More information about the Ads-l mailing list