Invading Pearl harbor

David Metevia djmetevia at CHARTERMI.NET
Fri Feb 5 19:31:20 UTC 2010


I think invasion also implies an intent to conquer and stay.

On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Brian Hitchcock <brianhi at skechers.com>wrote:

> ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> -----------------------
> Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Poster:       Brian Hitchcock <brianhi at SKECHERS.COM>
> Subject:      Invading Pearl harbor
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> What seems more odd than the quotation marks around "evil" is the use of
> the
> word "invasion" to describe what the Japanese did to Pearl Harbor.
>  Wouldn't
> "bombing' or 'attack' or 'destruction' be more apt? Doesn't an invasion
> imply (at least some) 'boots on the ground'?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org



More information about the Ads-l mailing list