non-paternity event

Wilson Gray hwgray at GMAIL.COM
Sun Feb 21 19:54:35 UTC 2010

George writes:

"... midnight creep ..."

Is that actually missing from HDAS? _Creep_ itself is there, though
missing a slightly different nuance from the one that I'm accustomed
to. I.e., one creeps _away_ from one's significant other and creeps
_to_ a potential new significant other or _to_ someone else's
significant other. One creeps _on_ one's significant other and creeps
back _in_ to one's own home after the assignation. That is, 'mongst me
and my handlers, there was always a sexual nuance.

You got me tossin' in my bed
Talkin' in my sleep
Now's the time
For our _midnight creep_

Good Lovin', performed by The Clovers, ca.1954 (off the top of my
head), composed by the late, great Ahmet Ertegün, under his nom de
boogie-joogie, "Nugetre."


On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 1:50 PM, George Thompson
<george.thompson at> wrote:
> ---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
> Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Poster:       George Thompson <george.thompson at NYU.EDU>
> Subject:      non-paternity event
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> In an idle moment --  which I seem to have many of -- I was looking at a recent issue of the New England Biographical and Genealogical Register, specifically at an article attempting to sort out 3 guys named Isaac Phelps, who were all running about Windsor, Conn. in the early 1700s.  A part of the research involved a DNA test, I suppose of several living men descended from the original American Phelps.  Regrettably, the DNA tests were inconsistent, a fact presented with the remark that evidently "an early non-paternity event" had occurred.
> This was a new term to me, but I supposed it to be a genealogist's euphemism for saying that somebody, sometime back when, had made that midnight creep while somebody else was off to market to sell his pumpkins.
> It's also new to the OED.  I find that it seems to be entering academic social science writing.
> Proquest show 7 occurrences beginning in 2000, the first 6 in connection with genealogical research, but the latest from something called Psychology & Psychiatry Journal, published in Atlanta, issue of March 21, 2009. pg. 108
> "According to a study from Vienna, Austria, "Nonpaternity (i.e., discrepant biological versus social fatherhood) if affects many issues of interests to psychologists, including familial dynamics, interpersonal relationships, sexuality, and fertility, and therefore represents an important topic for psychological research. The advent of modern contraceptive methods, particularly the market launch of the birth-control pill in the early 1960s and its increased use ever since, should have affected rates of nonpaternity (i.e., discrepant genetic and social fatherhood)."
>  (This is an oddly garbled article.  In addition to "if affects many" in the passage quoted, there is "The eligible. database. Comprised 32 published samples")
> I was of course shocked to think that Puritans might do that sort of thing.  More to the point, some of my ancestors also roamed Windsor, Conn. in the early 1700s.  Might one of my 128 great-great-great-great-great grandmothers have. . . ?   Surely not.
> George A. Thompson
> Author of A Documentary History of "The African Theatre", Northwestern Univ. Pr., 1998, but nothing much lately.
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society -

All say, "How hard it is that we have to die!"––a strange complaint to
come from the mouths of people who have had to live.
–Mark Twain

The American Dialect Society -

More information about the Ads-l mailing list